`waitForRunningJobLog` gave one minute to run creation, scheduling, the container start and the first log flush, then blamed the missing log line, which is how https://gitea.com/gitea/runner/actions/runs/927661 failed. It now gets the suite's `runTimeout` and reports the job's status with the run logs on timeout, and the job holds ten seconds instead of two, so neither the marker nor the cancellation arrives after it has exited.
Against gitea 1.28+ this costs nothing, since the cancel ends the job as soon as the marker appears. Against 1.27, which has no cancel route and waits the job out, the suite goes from about 20s to about 23s, as the tests run in parallel.
*Written by Claude.*
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/runner/pulls/1230
Reviewed-by: bircni <bircni@icloud.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Three independent fixes, one commit each.
1. Hosts and ports were interpolated directly when building URLs, so a literal IPv6 address produced an unbracketed authority, making `ACTIONS_CACHE_URL`, `ACTIONS_RUNTIME_URL` and the artifact server listener unusable. Hosts are expected bare, as documented for `cache.host`, so an address that already carries brackets is no longer accepted.
2. `cache-server` waited on its own `os.Interrupt` channel and ignored SIGTERM, so service managers and container runtimes had to kill it.
3. Task admission used a separate `Load` and `Store`, so two concurrent dispatches of the same task id could both be admitted.
Assisted-by: Claude Code:Opus 5
Co-authored-by: bircni <bircni@icloud.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/runner/pulls/1217
Reviewed-by: bircni <bircni@icloud.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Cache v2 makes the cache server the `ACTIONS_RESULTS_URL` origin, so artifact calls arrived there and were proxied on to Gitea, failing whenever it could not reach the instance.
- Artifact calls are answered with a redirect, so the cache server opens no connection to Gitea. A scheme change or an untrusted instance is still proxied, but there the cache server is the runner itself, which already reaches Gitea.
- Failures answer in twirp, not an empty `502` that clients report as `Unexpected end of JSON input`.
- `cache.v2: false` really points artifacts at Gitea now.
- Cache reservations are bound to the job that made them, so two jobs saving one key cannot commit against each other's upload, and a retry after a lost answer no longer fails a saved entry.
- The toolkit patch, which edits the GitHub-host check out of an action's bundle, was left in the shared checkout where a job running with `runner.patch_actions: false` could inherit it. It is put back after the job's copy.
- `exec` names an origin for the cache v2 it advertises, and masks its runtime token.
Behaviour changes: `no_proxy` no longer exempts `cache.external_server`, and `cache.enabled: false` also stops external registration.
Fixes https://gitea.com/gitea/runner/issues/1208
Fixes https://gitea.com/gitea/runner/issues/1211
Assisted by Claude (Opus 5).
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/runner/pulls/1216
Reviewed-by: bircni <bircni@icloud.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Adds a real-Gitea compatibility suite against stable and nightly to catch runner and API drift before release.
The suite shares one Gitea and regular runner, using repository runners only for cache v1/v2 and ephemeral behavior. It covers registration, payload and log encoding, secrets, variables, services, artifacts, outputs, matrices, cache, dispatch, live logs, cancellation, and ephemeral teardown.
CI runs both images in parallel. Warm local timings:
| Image | Before | After |
| --- | ---: | ---: |
| `gitea/gitea:latest` | ~70s | 26.54s |
| `gitea/gitea:main-nightly` | ~54s | 22.53s |
The former serial matrix took about 2 minutes. Parallel suite execution is now bounded by the slower ~26.5-second variant.
Shared Renovate matcher: https://gitea.com/gitea/renovate-config/pulls/552
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Reviewed-on: https://gitea.com/gitea/runner/pulls/1180
Reviewed-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: silverwind <2021+silverwind@noreply.gitea.com>
Co-authored-by: bircni <bircni@icloud.com>
silverwind
Renovate Botandsilverwind